BRH v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2015] NSWCATAD 182
The applicant is eligible for a Category D recognition payment reduced by 10% due to some contributory behaviour under s 44(1)(a); evidence establishes eligibility for a special grant as a transitional claimant under Schedule 2, Clause 5 of the Act; reduction does not apply to the special grant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Hearing and Determination; Orders Made
- Outcome
- Decision of Senior Assessor set aside; orders made in favour of the applicant
- Legal Topics
- ['recognition Payment' 'eligibility' 'reduction Under Act' 'special Grant' 'transitional Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Hearing and Determination; Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant is eligible for a recognition payment under Victims Rights and Support Act 2013' 'Whether applicant is eligible for a special grant under the transitional provisions' 'Whether reduction under section 44(1)(a) applies to special grant']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is eligible for a Category D recognition payment reduced by 10% due to some contributory behaviour under s 44(1)(a); evidence establishes eligibility for a special grant as a transitional claimant under Schedule 2, Clause 5 of the Act; reduction does not apply to the special grant.
Court Disposition
Decision of Senior Assessor set aside; orders made in favour of the applicant
Orders
- ['The decision of the Senior Assessor is set aside.' 'Applicant is eligible for a Category D recognition payment reduced by 10% under section 44(1)(a) (payable in sum of $1,350.00).' 'Applicant is eligible for a special grant payable from the Victims Support Fund in accordance with Schedule 2 Clause 5 (payable in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment