Regina v Lloyd [2003] NSWCCA 49

Regina v Lloyd [2003] NSWCCA 49

The sentencing judge erred by imposing concurrent four-year sentences in a global manner without applying or referring to the Pearce principle and by failing to give effect to the utilitarian value of the applicant's early guilty pleas. The third challenge concerning general deterrence was not made out. On re-sentencing, the offences were objectively very serious, especially because the applicant used a syringe filled with hepatitis C affected blood, but her youth, absence of prior convictions, cooperation, remorse, family support, rehabilitation efforts, reasonable prospects of rehabilitation and early guilty pleas justified reduced sentences and a finding of special circumstances...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentences below set aside; applicant re-sentenced.
Legal Topics
['severity Appeal' 'stealing From the Person in Circumstances of Aggravation' 'being Armed With an Offensive Weapon With Intent to Commit a Felony' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'utilitarian Value of Guilty Plea' 'young Offender' 'rehabilitation' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing'] ['severity Appeal' 'stealing From the Person in Circumstances of Aggravation' 'being Armed With an Offensive Weapon With Intent to Commit a Felony' 'guilty Plea Discount' 'utilitarian Value of Guilty Plea' 'young Offender' 'rehabilitation' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge failed to sentence in accordance with Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 by imposing sentences in a global manner without differentiating between the offences.' "Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to give effect to the utilitarian value of the applicant's early pleas of guilty." 'Whether the sentencing judge erred by failing to reduce the weight given to general deterrence in sentencing the applicant.']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge erred by imposing concurrent four-year sentences in a global manner without applying or referring to the Pearce principle and by failing to give effect to the utilitarian value of the applicant's early guilty pleas. The third challenge concerning general deterrence was not made out. On re-sentencing, the offences were objectively very serious, especially because the applicant used a syringe filled with hepatitis C affected blood, but her youth, absence of prior convictions, cooperation, remorse, family support, rehabilitation efforts, reasonable prospects of rehabilitation and early guilty pleas justified reduced sentences and a finding of special circumstances...

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; sentences below set aside; applicant re-sentenced.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed, sentences below set aside.' 'In respect of the offence of stealing from the person in circumstances of aggravation, the applicant is sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months, to commence on 22 March 2002 and to end on 21 September 2003, to be...