CROSS v BARNES TOWING AND SALVAGE (QLD) PTY LTD & ORS [2005] NSWCA 273
The Tow Truck Industry Act 1998 (NSW) does not contravene s92 of the Constitution as it does not impose discriminatory burdens of a protectionist kind on interstate operators; the exemption under reg 69(1) does not apply because 'towing work' commenced in New South Wales when the actual towing started, not when the vehicle left Queensland. The charges against the defendants should not have been dismissed on constitutional grounds.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Brian Clarence Cross; First Defendant: Barnes Towing and Salvage (QLD) Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: James Michael Ruff; Third Defendant: John Anthony Dent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Interstate Trade and Commerce, Freedom of Interstate Intercourse, Statutory Interpretation of Tow Truck Industry Regulation, Licensing Requirements for Interstate Tow Truck Operators
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Clarence Cross
Plaintiff
Barnes Towing and Salvage (QLD) Pty Ltd
First Defendant
James Michael Ruff
Second Defendant
John Anthony Dent
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Local Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tow Truck Industry Act 1998 (NSW) contravenes s92 of the Constitution by imposing discriminatory burdens of a protectionist kind on interstate tow truck operators
- 2 Proper interpretation of reg 69(1) and 69(2) of the Tow Truck Industry Regulation 1999 (NSW): meaning of 'towing work' and 'starts in this State'
Ratio Decidendi
The Tow Truck Industry Act 1998 (NSW) does not contravene s92 of the Constitution as it does not impose discriminatory burdens of a protectionist kind on interstate operators; the exemption under reg 69(1) does not apply because 'towing work' commenced in New South Wales when the actual towing started, not when the vehicle left Queensland. The charges against the defendants should not have been dismissed on constitutional grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed with costs
Orders
- Orders of the Local Court at Lismore dismissing the relevant charges set aside
- Charges remitted to the Local Court for findings to be made that the offences were proved and for further hearing and determination according to law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment