Clark v Leyshan [2007] NSWSC 52
The plaintiff had been left without adequate provision under the will, having minimal cash reserves and significant repair obligations, and it was appropriate to provide him with a legacy given his circumstances despite capital assets and limited income.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Brian Clark; Defendant: Dorothy Leyshan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family Provision Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; legacy ordered for plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Adequate Provision for Proper Maintenance, Legacy From Estate, Estate Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Clark
Plaintiff
Dorothy Leyshan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has been left without adequate provision for his proper maintenance, education and advancement in life under the will
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff had been left without adequate provision under the will, having minimal cash reserves and significant repair obligations, and it was appropriate to provide him with a legacy given his circumstances despite capital assets and limited income.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; legacy ordered for plaintiff.
Orders
- Plaintiff to receive a legacy in the sum of $50,000.
- Plaintiff's costs, excluding any uplift factor, to be paid out of the estate on the ordinary basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment