Cohen v iSoft Group Pty Limited [2012] FCA 1071
Dr Cohen was not employed by the First Respondent at the date of termination; the effect of the secondment agreements and the evidence is that he became employed by IBA Health (Asia) Pte Ltd. Therefore, the applicant's claims against the First Respondent for contractual benefits, notice, redundancy, long service leave, and statutory claims fail.
- Parties
- Applicant: Brian Cohen; First Respondent: iSoft Group Pty Limited (ACN 063 539 702); Second Respondent: iSoft Health (Asia) Pte Limited (Company No 199905436Z)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application (employment/contract) / Final Judgment (reasons and Orders Pending Final Orders)
- Outcome
- All substantive claims against the First Respondent dismissed; parties to bring short minutes of orders to give effect to reasons.
- Legal Topics
- Construction of Employment Contracts, Identification of Employer, Secondment Agreements, Termination of Employment, Notice Period, Implied Terms – Mutual Trust and Confidence, Redundancy, Long Service Leave, Fair Work Act Extraterritorial Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Cohen
Applicant
iSoft Group Pty Limited (ACN 063 539 702)
First Respondent
iSoft Health (Asia) Pte Limited (Company No 199905436Z)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application (employment/contract) / Final Judgment (reasons and Orders Pending Final Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the applicant employed by the First Respondent at the date of termination?
- 2 Did the 2000 Agreement govern the employment relationship at termination?
- 3 Should secondment agreements be rectified to reflect the intended employer?
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Cohen was not employed by the First Respondent at the date of termination; the effect of the secondment agreements and the evidence is that he became employed by IBA Health (Asia) Pte Ltd. Therefore, the applicant's claims against the First Respondent for contractual benefits, notice, redundancy, long service leave, and statutory claims fail.
Court Disposition
All substantive claims against the First Respondent dismissed; parties to bring short minutes of orders to give effect to reasons.
Orders
- The parties are to bring in Short Minutes of Orders giving effect to these reasons on or before 12 October 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment