BRIAN DUNNE v. HURSTVILLE CITY COUNCIL [1998] NSWLEC 84 (7 May 1998) [1998] NSWLEC 35
The modification sought only deletes a condition and does not change the nature of development; the development consent was still on foot at the time of application as notification for extension was given and council had not determined to refuse or grant further extension. There was no merit to council's arguments regarding lapse or use as a brothel in the context of the modification application.
- Parties
- Applicant: Brian Dunne; Respondent: Hurstville City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Modification granted.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent Modification, Lapse of Consent, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Dunne
Applicant
Hurstville City Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development to which the consent as modified relates is substantially the same development
- 2 Whether the development consent has lapsed pursuant to s 99(4A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 3 Whether the s 102 application was made after the development consent had lapsed
Ratio Decidendi
The modification sought only deletes a condition and does not change the nature of development; the development consent was still on foot at the time of application as notification for extension was given and council had not determined to refuse or grant further extension. There was no merit to council's arguments regarding lapse or use as a brothel in the context of the modification application.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Modification granted.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development consent No 294/94 in respect of premises at 327A Belmore Road Riverwood is modified by the deletion of condition 10.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment