Regina v Steer [2000] NSWCCA 233

Regina v Steer [2000] NSWCCA 233

The Court found that the sentences imposed were within the proper range of sentencing discretion and that there was no error of the kind that would warrant appellate intervention. The arguments regarding the form of the charge, the applicant’s personal circumstances, psychiatric evidence, and subsequent matters such as prison protection status, were all considered and did not amount to appealable error.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Brian James Steer
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Outcome
Appeal Dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentence, Severity of Sentence, Armed Robbery, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Sentence Severity of Sentence Armed Robbery Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Brian James Steer

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Severity of Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was an error in dealing with the applicant for aggravated armed robbery instead of the lesser form
  2. 2 Whether the sentences imposed were excessive or outside the range of sentencing discretion
  3. 3 Whether the effect of protection status in prison, sentencing guidelines, personal circumstances, mitigating factors, and psychiatric reports were properly considered

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the sentences imposed were within the proper range of sentencing discretion and that there was no error of the kind that would warrant appellate intervention. The arguments regarding the form of the charge, the applicant’s personal circumstances, psychiatric evidence, and subsequent matters such as prison protection status, were all considered and did not amount to appealable error.

Court Disposition

Appeal Dismissed

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed