Brian John Harris v Mark Kevin Harris [2013] NSWSC 1010

Brian John Harris v Mark Kevin Harris [2013] NSWSC 1010

The contract, transfer and lease were not unjust within the meaning of Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) because the plaintiff imposed the limitation of selling only to a family member, understood and accepted all consequences, the sale price reflected all the defendant could afford, and no unfair conduct or tactics by the defendant were found.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Statement of Claim / Final Judgment
Outcome
Statement of claim dismissed
Legal Topics
['unjust Contracts' 'contracts Review Act 1980 (nsw)' 'family Transactions' 'under Value Sale' 'leaseback Arrangement']
['contracts' 'equity'] ['unjust Contracts' 'contracts Review Act 1980 (nsw)' 'family Transactions' 'under Value Sale' 'leaseback Arrangement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Statement of Claim / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the contract for sale and lease of property was unjust under Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW)' 'Whether relief should be granted to increase the purchase price and order compensation']

Ratio Decidendi

The contract, transfer and lease were not unjust within the meaning of Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) because the plaintiff imposed the limitation of selling only to a family member, understood and accepted all consequences, the sale price reflected all the defendant could afford, and no unfair conduct or tactics by the defendant were found.

Court Disposition

Statement of claim dismissed

Orders

  • ['Statement of claim dismissed' "Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings" 'Direct that the exhibits be returned after 28 days']