Smith v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2004] NSWADT 182
The Tribunal had jurisdiction to accept the application under s 55(2)(c) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997. The relevant question was whether, at the time of the Commissioner's decisions, Mr Smith as an undischarged bankrupt had taken all reasonable steps to avoid bankruptcy; his later discharge was not relevant. The statutory test did not extend to all conduct that caused the debts, but only to steps to avoid bankruptcy once bankruptcy was or should have been apparent. Mr Smith reduced debts, obtained financial advice, attempted negotiations with the judgment creditor, considered bankruptcy alternatives, and did not shield assets. A reasonable person with his knowledge...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Administrative Review of Disciplinary Decisions Concerning a Real Estate Agent's Licence / Principal Matter; Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application successful; disciplinary decisions set aside and substituted determination made that Mr Smith was not a disqualified person.
- Legal Topics
- ['merits Review' "cancellation of Real Estate Agent's Licence" 'disqualified Person' 'reasonable Steps to Avoid Bankruptcy' 'relevance of Subsequent Events' 'internal Review Requirement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Administrative Review of Disciplinary Decisions Concerning a Real Estate Agent's Licence / Principal Matter; Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the Commissioner's decisions despite no internal review having been finalised." "Whether the Tribunal should assess the decisions by reference to the facts at the time of the Commissioner's decisions or by reference to Mr Smith's later discharge from bankruptcy." 'Whether Mr Smith took all reasonable steps to avoid bankruptcy within the meaning of s 16(1)(c) of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002.' "Whether the Commissioner's decisions to cancel Mr Smith's licence and make disqualification declarations were the correct and preferable decisions."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal had jurisdiction to accept the application under s 55(2)(c) of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997. The relevant question was whether, at the time of the Commissioner's decisions, Mr Smith as an undischarged bankrupt had taken all reasonable steps to avoid bankruptcy; his later discharge was not relevant. The statutory test did not extend to all conduct that caused the debts, but only to steps to avoid bankruptcy once bankruptcy was or should have been apparent. Mr Smith reduced debts, obtained financial advice, attempted negotiations with the judgment creditor, considered bankruptcy alternatives, and did not shield assets. A reasonable person with his knowledge...
Court Disposition
Application successful; disciplinary decisions set aside and substituted determination made that Mr Smith was not a disqualified person.
Orders
- ['The disciplinary decisions made in relation to the applicant are set aside.' 'In substitution for those decisions, the Tribunal determines that Mr Smith was not a "disqualified person" pursuant to s 16(1)(c) of the Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002 at the time the Commissioner made his decision because...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment