Brickdock Pty Limited v Central Coast Council [2025] NSWLEC 1056

Brickdock Pty Limited v Central Coast Council [2025] NSWLEC 1056

The Court is satisfied that all jurisdictional prerequisites for the grant of development consent have been satisfied, including justification for the variations to height of building and floor space ratio standards under cl 4.6 of Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2014. By agreement of the parties and in accordance with s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the appeal is upheld and consent is granted subject to imposed conditions.

Parties
Applicant: Brickdock Pty Limited; Respondent: Central Coast Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 February 2025
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Legal Topics
Development Appeal, Variation of Development Standards, Height of Buildings, Floor Space Ratio, Jurisdictional Prerequisites, Public Notification, Heritage, Acid Sulfate Soils, Flood Planning, Coastal Management, Contamination, Sustainability Index, Design Quality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brickdock Pty Limited

Applicant

Central Coast Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Development Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference

  1. 1 Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for grant of consent are satisfied
  2. 2 Whether variations to height of building and floor space ratio development standards are justified under cl 4.6 of Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2014
  3. 3 Whether development consent can be granted following parties' agreement under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979

Ratio Decidendi

The Court is satisfied that all jurisdictional prerequisites for the grant of development consent have been satisfied, including justification for the variations to height of building and floor space ratio standards under cl 4.6 of Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2014. By agreement of the parties and in accordance with s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the appeal is upheld and consent is granted subject to imposed conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld.
  • The written request prepared by Clarke Dowdle & Associates dated 15 October 2024 pursuant to cl 4.6 of the Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2014 seeking variation to the floor space ratio development standard pursuant to cl 4.4 is upheld.