In the matter of Britten-Norman Pty Limited (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 394

In the matter of Britten-Norman Pty Limited (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 394

The application was dismissed because BN did not provide evidentiary material sufficient to permit a reasonable assessment of any loss or damage allegedly suffered from ATA's conduct or breach. The evidence did not allow the Court to determine that any offsetting claim exceeded the statutory demand debt or to...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside a Creditor's Statutory Demand / Hearing of Application in the Equity Division Corporations List
Outcome
Application dismissed. Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the application, as agreed or as assessed.
Legal Topics
['winding Up' "creditor's Statutory Demand" 'offsetting Claim' 'genuine Dispute' 'set Off' 'sufficient Evidentiary Material for Damages']
['corporations' 'insolvency' 'contract' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct'] ['winding Up' "creditor's Statutory Demand" 'offsetting Claim' 'genuine Dispute' 'set Off' 'sufficient Evidentiary Material for Damages']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside a Creditor's Statutory Demand / Hearing of Application in the Equity Division Corporations List

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether BN established an offsetting claim for the purposes of s 459H(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether BN established a genuine dispute as to the claimed debt for the purposes of s 459H(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by reason of a set-off.' 'Whether the statutory demand should be set aside for some other reason under s 459J(1)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' "Whether there was sufficient evidentiary material to allow the Court to make a reasonable assessment of BN's asserted damages."]

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because BN did not provide evidentiary material sufficient to permit a reasonable assessment of any loss or damage allegedly suffered from ATA's conduct or breach. The evidence did not allow the Court to determine that any offsetting claim exceeded the statutory demand debt or to quantify any lesser set-off, and the same deficiency meant BN had not shown a plausible set-off extinguishing the debt or any other reason under s 459J(1)(b) to set aside the demand.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. Plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the application, as agreed or as assessed.

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' "The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the application, as agreed or as assessed."]