Broadcast Australia Pty Ltd v Kim Noonan & Anor [2011] NSWSC 1524
The Commonwealth acquired land (a right for access, defined by statute as 'land'), not merely a personal or revocable right, by force of the Lands Acquisition Act 1955-1966. Its use is not restricted to the public purpose declared on acquisition. However, the Minister's Declaration of 27 April 1999 under the National Transmission Network Sale Act did not transfer that land (the right) to the plaintiff, as the right was acquired by compulsory process and not referable to an 'instrument, contract or legally binding arrangement.' Thus ownership remains with the Commonwealth.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Broadcast Australia Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Kim Noonan; Second Defendant: Estate of the Late Rube Lambert
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- None—judgment delivered and matter listed for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- Compulsory Acquisition, Easements, Interests in Land, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Broadcast Australia Pty Ltd
Plaintiff
Kim Noonan
First Defendant
Estate of the Late Rube Lambert
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Characterisation or nature of the right acquired by the Commonwealth in 1968
- 2 Whether acquired right was limited to the public purpose for which it was acquired
- 3 Whether the right was transferred to the plaintiff's predecessor pursuant to the National Transmission Network Sale Act 1998 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The Commonwealth acquired land (a right for access, defined by statute as 'land'), not merely a personal or revocable right, by force of the Lands Acquisition Act 1955-1966. Its use is not restricted to the public purpose declared on acquisition. However, the Minister's Declaration of 27 April 1999 under the National Transmission Network Sale Act did not transfer that land (the right) to the plaintiff, as the right was acquired by compulsory process and not referable to an 'instrument, contract or legally binding arrangement.' Thus ownership remains with the Commonwealth.
Court Disposition
None—judgment delivered and matter listed for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment