Broadview Group Pty Ltd v Auburn City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1214
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the proceedings were to be disposed of in accordance with that decision by orders giving effect to the agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'land and Environment Court Act 1979 S 34(3) Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 was a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement."]
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the proceedings were to be disposed of in accordance with that decision by orders giving effect to the agreement.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ["Final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on 18 May 2016."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment