Brooks Sports, Inc v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 1) [2011] FCA 999
The Court was satisfied that the applicant had established a very strong prima facie case of trade mark infringement under s 120(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) and that there was a real risk the respondents may destroy or make evidence unavailable, warranting the grant of an Anton Piller order (search order).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Search Order (anton Piller Order) / Interlocutory; Ex Parte Application Granted
- Outcome
- Search order (Anton Piller order) granted pending further interlocutory hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Marks' 'anton Piller Orders' 'infringement' 'interlocutory Search Orders' 'preservation of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Search Order (anton Piller Order) / Interlocutory; Ex Parte Application Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a prima facie case of trade mark infringement was established under s 120(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)' 'Whether there was a real possibility that respondents may destroy or make unavailable relevant evidence' 'Whether the circumstances justified the grant of an Anton Piller order']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the applicant had established a very strong prima facie case of trade mark infringement under s 120(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) and that there was a real risk the respondents may destroy or make evidence unavailable, warranting the grant of an Anton Piller order (search order).
Court Disposition
Search order (Anton Piller order) granted pending further interlocutory hearing.
Orders
- ['Search order made, permitting search and seizure of specified items at defined premises.' 'Return date set for further hearing and interlocutory relief (21 July 2011).' 'Costs reserved to further hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment