Brownlee v Manteit [2000] FCA 1937
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Posture
- Bankruptcy Application / Orders and Reasons for Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant's failure in 1995 to file her statement of affairs as required by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) was an irregularity under s 306, but did not invalidate the proceedings, no substantial injustice being found. Her statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996, and she was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999.
Court disposition
Declarations granted; no order as to costs
Orders
- Failure of applicant to file statement of affairs with Registrar in 1995 was an irregularity within s 306 of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
- Proceeding not invalidated by that irregularity
- Applicant's statement of affairs deemed filed on or before 16 December 1996
- Applicant discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999
- No order as to costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Rhonda Ann Brownlee
Applicant Counsel: A J BrownleeMark Manteit
First RespondentInsolvency and Trustee Service of Australia
Second Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Bankruptcy Application / Orders and Reasons for Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether failure to file statement of affairs in 1995 was an irregularity under s 306 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
- 02
Whether the proceedings were invalidated due to that irregularity
- 03
Whether the applicant's statement of affairs was deemed to have been filed by a certain date
- 04
Whether the applicant was validly discharged from bankruptcy
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Sought orders that the failure to file the statement of affairs was an irregularity and did not invalidate proceedings; sought declaration of deemed filing and discharge dates.
- Respondent
- No objection to the orders sought was indicated on behalf of the first respondent; no appearance for either respondent.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
s 306 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Failure to comply with procedural requirements may constitute an 'irregularity' under s 306 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), not necessarily invalidating the proceedings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant's failure in 1995 to file her statement of affairs as required by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) was an irregularity under s 306, but did not invalidate the proceedings, no substantial injustice being found. Her statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996, and she was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999.
Obiter and limits
- The first respondent appeared to misconceive his responsibilities as trustee, which are not to refuse to assist the Court simply because the estate money has run out.
Court disposition
Declarations granted; no order as to costs
- Failure of applicant to file statement of affairs with Registrar in 1995 was an irregularity within s 306 of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
- Proceeding not invalidated by that irregularity
- Applicant's statement of affairs deemed filed on or before 16 December 1996
- Applicant discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999
- No order as to costs
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brownlee v Manteit [2000] FCA 1937
RHONDA ANN BROWNLEE v MARK MANTEIT & ANOR N7937 of 2000
MADGWICK J 5 DECEMBER 2000
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N7937 OF 2000
BETWEEN: RHONDA ANN BROWNLEE
APPLICANT
AND: MARK MANTEIT
FIRST RESPONDENT
INSOLVENCY AND TRUSTEE SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT DECLARES THAT: 1 The failure of the applicant to file her statement of affairs with the Registrar of this Court in 1995 was an irregularity within the meaning of s 306 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). 2 In the circumstances, the proceedings being the filing of such a statement of affairs, was not invalidated by that irregularity. 3 The applicant's statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996. 4 The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N7937 OF 2000
BETWEEN: RHONDA ANN BROWNLEE
APPLICANT
AND: MARK MANTEIT
FIRST RESPONDENT
INSOLVENCY AND TRUSTEE SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (revised from transcript) HIS HONOUR: 1 The Deputy Registrar has apparently spoken to somebody in the office of Mr Manteit, the first respondent, he being absent, and the view has been conveyed to the Registrar that there is no objection to the application which the applicant seeks. It seems to me that it would be within the power of the Court to grant the orders sought and I will do so. 2 I declare that the failure of the applicant in 1995 to file her statement of affairs with the Registrar of this Court, as the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ("the Act") required, was an irregularity within the meaning of s 306 of the Act and I declare that in the circumstances the proceeding, being the filing of such a statement of affairs, was not invalidated by that irregularity. 3 I further declare that I am not of the opinion that substantial injustice has been caused by this irregularity. I declare accordingly that the applicant's statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996 and I declare that the applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999. There will be no order as to costs. 4 I might add that the first respondent would appear to misconceive his responsibilities as a trustee, which are not to stay quiet and refuse to assist the Court simply because the money in the estate has run out. I will cause a copy of this judgment to be sent by the Registrar to Mr Manteit.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.
Associate: Dated: 15 January 2001
Representative for the Applicant: A J Brownlee (with leave)
No appearance for the 1st and 2nd Respondent.
Date of Hearing: 5 December 2000
Date of Judgment: 5 December 2000
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.