Australia Judgment

Brownlee v Manteit [2000] FCA 1937

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant's failure in 1995 to file her statement of affairs as required by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) was an irregularity under s 306, but did not invalidate the proceedings, no substantial injustice being found. Her statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996, and she was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999.

Court disposition

Declarations granted; no order as to costs

Orders

  • Failure of applicant to file statement of affairs with Registrar in 1995 was an irregularity within s 306 of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
  • Proceeding not invalidated by that irregularity
  • Applicant's statement of affairs deemed filed on or before 16 December 1996
  • Applicant discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999
  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Rhonda Ann Brownlee

Applicant Counsel: A J Brownlee

Mark Manteit

First Respondent

Insolvency and Trustee Service of Australia

Second Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Bankruptcy Application / Orders and Reasons for Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Sought orders that the failure to file the statement of affairs was an irregularity and did not invalidate proceedings; sought declaration of deemed filing and discharge dates.
Respondent
No objection to the orders sought was indicated on behalf of the first respondent; no appearance for either respondent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    s 306 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)

    Failure to comply with procedural requirements may constitute an 'irregularity' under s 306 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), not necessarily invalidating the proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant's failure in 1995 to file her statement of affairs as required by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) was an irregularity under s 306, but did not invalidate the proceedings, no substantial injustice being found. Her statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996, and she was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999.

Obiter and limits

  • The first respondent appeared to misconceive his responsibilities as trustee, which are not to refuse to assist the Court simply because the estate money has run out.

Court disposition

Declarations granted; no order as to costs

  • Failure of applicant to file statement of affairs with Registrar in 1995 was an irregularity within s 306 of Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
  • Proceeding not invalidated by that irregularity
  • Applicant's statement of affairs deemed filed on or before 16 December 1996
  • Applicant discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999
  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Brownlee v Manteit [2000] FCA 1937

RHONDA ANN BROWNLEE v MARK MANTEIT & ANOR N7937 of 2000

MADGWICK J 5 DECEMBER 2000

SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N7937 OF 2000

BETWEEN: RHONDA ANN BROWNLEE

APPLICANT

AND: MARK MANTEIT

FIRST RESPONDENT

INSOLVENCY AND TRUSTEE SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA

SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE: MADGWICK J

DATE OF ORDER: 5 DECEMBER 2000

WHERE MADE: SYDNEY

THE COURT DECLARES THAT: 1 The failure of the applicant to file her statement of affairs with the Registrar of this Court in 1995 was an irregularity within the meaning of s 306 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). 2 In the circumstances, the proceedings being the filing of such a statement of affairs, was not invalidated by that irregularity. 3 The applicant's statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996. 4 The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N7937 OF 2000

BETWEEN: RHONDA ANN BROWNLEE

APPLICANT

AND: MARK MANTEIT

FIRST RESPONDENT

INSOLVENCY AND TRUSTEE SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA

SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE: MADGWICK J

DATE: 5 DECEMBER 2000

PLACE: SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (revised from transcript) HIS HONOUR: 1 The Deputy Registrar has apparently spoken to somebody in the office of Mr Manteit, the first respondent, he being absent, and the view has been conveyed to the Registrar that there is no objection to the application which the applicant seeks. It seems to me that it would be within the power of the Court to grant the orders sought and I will do so. 2 I declare that the failure of the applicant in 1995 to file her statement of affairs with the Registrar of this Court, as the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ("the Act") required, was an irregularity within the meaning of s 306 of the Act and I declare that in the circumstances the proceeding, being the filing of such a statement of affairs, was not invalidated by that irregularity. 3 I further declare that I am not of the opinion that substantial injustice has been caused by this irregularity. I declare accordingly that the applicant's statement of affairs is deemed to have been filed on or before 16 December 1996 and I declare that the applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 17 December 1999. There will be no order as to costs. 4 I might add that the first respondent would appear to misconceive his responsibilities as a trustee, which are not to stay quiet and refuse to assist the Court simply because the money in the estate has run out. I will cause a copy of this judgment to be sent by the Registrar to Mr Manteit.

I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Madgwick.

Associate: Dated: 15 January 2001

Representative for the Applicant: A J Brownlee (with leave)

No appearance for the 1st and 2nd Respondent.

Date of Hearing: 5 December 2000

Date of Judgment: 5 December 2000

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 306

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.