Cooper v NSW Ministry of Health [2018] NSWCATAD 37
There were reasonable grounds for finding that the majority of the disputed documents were Cabinet Information under the GIPA Act as supported by the evidence; where reasonable grounds were not found for specific documents, those documents were to be supplied to the Tribunal for further consideration.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bruce Andrew Cooper; First Respondent: NSW Ministry of Health; Second Respondent: Premier of NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Interlocutory Application/orders on Access to Documents
- Outcome
- Affirmed in part; further consideration ordered for certain documents
- Legal Topics
- Government Information Access, Cabinet Information, Public Interest Test, Freedom of Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bruce Andrew Cooper
Applicant
NSW Ministry of Health
First Respondent
Premier of NSW
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Interlocutory Application/orders on Access to Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the documents withheld were properly classified as 'Cabinet Information' under Clause 2, Schedule 1 of the GIPA Act
- 2 Whether the respondent had reasonable grounds for refusing access to documents under s106 of the GIPA Act
Ratio Decidendi
There were reasonable grounds for finding that the majority of the disputed documents were Cabinet Information under the GIPA Act as supported by the evidence; where reasonable grounds were not found for specific documents, those documents were to be supplied to the Tribunal for further consideration.
Court Disposition
Affirmed in part; further consideration ordered for certain documents
Orders
- The Respondent's decision affirming classification of listed documents as 'Cabinet Information' is affirmed.
- The Respondent is to provide specific documents (19(1)(D), 41, 50(2), 56, 70(1)(c), and a copy of the February 2016 and November 2015 Cabinet Submissions) to the Tribunal within 7 days for further review under s106(2) of the GIPA Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment