Webb v Milton [2024] NSWLEC 1851
Both the Jacaranda and Bougainvillea caused damage to the fence; applicant satisfied all jurisdictional requirements for orders under the Act; orders are appropriate to remedy the damage.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bruce Charles Webb; First Respondent: Edward Milton; Second Respondent: Gail Milton
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Application / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made for tree work and fence repair at respondents' expense
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes Between Neighbours, Damage to Boundary Fence, Jurisdiction Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bruce Charles Webb
Applicant
Edward Milton
First Respondent
Gail Milton
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Application / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Jacaranda and Bougainvillea trees caused damage to the boundary fence
- 2 Whether the applicant made reasonable effort to reach agreement with the respondents prior to Court action
- 3 Whether the jurisdictional requirements under s 10 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
Both the Jacaranda and Bougainvillea caused damage to the fence; applicant satisfied all jurisdictional requirements for orders under the Act; orders are appropriate to remedy the damage.
Court Disposition
Orders made for tree work and fence repair at respondents' expense
Orders
- Respondents to contract AQF level 3 arborists to remove Jacaranda branch leaning on fence.
- Respondents/arborists to grind or excavate Bougainvillea stump to clear boundary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment