Regina -v- Creed [2000] NSWCCA 280
The evidence of the complainant's friend was admissible and was capable of corroborating the complainant. The judge was correct to admit the evidence, and its probative value was not outweighed by unfair prejudice. The prosecutor's address, although inappropriate in part, did not warrant discharging the jury as the trial judge gave appropriate directions and the trial as a whole remained fair.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Bruce James Creed
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Directions to Jury, Delay in Complaint, Prior Consistent Statements, Discharge of Jury, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Bruce James Creed
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in granting the Crown leave to adduce evidence of a prior consistent statement under s 108(3) of the Evidence Act 1995
- 2 Whether evidence of a school friend amounted to a prior consistent statement
- 3 Whether such evidence ought to have been excluded under s 137 of the Evidence Act 1995
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence of the complainant's friend was admissible and was capable of corroborating the complainant. The judge was correct to admit the evidence, and its probative value was not outweighed by unfair prejudice. The prosecutor's address, although inappropriate in part, did not warrant discharging the jury as the trial judge gave appropriate directions and the trial as a whole remained fair.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment