Lehrmann v Network Ten Pty Limited (Expert Evidence) [2023] FCA 1577
The report by Mr Reedy is admissible as opinion evidence under s 79 Evidence Act due to his demonstrated specialised knowledge arising from extensive lipreading experience, and the methodology and basis of his opinions are sufficiently disclosed; discretionary exclusion under s 135 is not warranted as the probative value is not substantially outweighed by prejudice, confusion or waste of time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Evidentiary Ruling on Expert Evidence Admissibility
- Outcome
- Expert evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'admissibility' 'lipreading Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Evidentiary Ruling on Expert Evidence Admissibility
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether lipreading expert evidence should be admitted despite late service' 'Whether the report by Mr Reedy constitutes admissible opinion evidence under s 79 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)' 'Whether the evidence should be excluded pursuant to s 135 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) due to prejudice, confusion or waste of time']
Ratio Decidendi
The report by Mr Reedy is admissible as opinion evidence under s 79 Evidence Act due to his demonstrated specialised knowledge arising from extensive lipreading experience, and the methodology and basis of his opinions are sufficiently disclosed; discretionary exclusion under s 135 is not warranted as the probative value is not substantially outweighed by prejudice, confusion or waste of time.
Court Disposition
Expert evidence admitted
Orders
- ["The first respondent be permitted to adduce into evidence the report entitled, 'Lip Read Transcription Of Soundless Recorded Speech', prepared by Mr Tim Reedy on 19 November 2023"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment