McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 6) [2011] FCA 1135
The mere tender of foreign competition statutes, without expert evidence as to their meaning and operation, is insufficient for the Court to infer anything about the content or application of foreign law, and it is not appropriate to assume the foreign law is the same as Australian law. The late tender would also cause prejudice to the respondents, preventing them from properly addressing the material.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding the Tender of Foreign Statutes
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['proof of Foreign Law' 'admissibility of Foreign Legislation' 'prejudice From Late Tender']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding the Tender of Foreign Statutes
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the mere tender of foreign legislation enables the Court to make inferences about foreign law' 'Whether it is appropriate to assume foreign law is the same as Australian law for the purpose sought' 'Whether late tender of the statutes has caused prejudice']
Ratio Decidendi
The mere tender of foreign competition statutes, without expert evidence as to their meaning and operation, is insufficient for the Court to infer anything about the content or application of foreign law, and it is not appropriate to assume the foreign law is the same as Australian law. The late tender would also cause prejudice to the respondents, preventing them from properly addressing the material.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ["The applicant's tender of competition statutes from the United Kingdom, European Union, United States, and New Zealand for the stated purpose is refused."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment