McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 6) [2011] FCA 1135

McHugh v Australian Jockey Club Limited (No 6) [2011] FCA 1135

The mere tender of foreign competition statutes, without expert evidence as to their meaning and operation, is insufficient for the Court to infer anything about the content or application of foreign law, and it is not appropriate to assume the foreign law is the same as Australian law. The late tender would also cause prejudice to the respondents, preventing them from properly addressing the material.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 September 2011
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding the Tender of Foreign Statutes
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
['proof of Foreign Law' 'admissibility of Foreign Legislation' 'prejudice From Late Tender']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Interlocutory Application Regarding the Tender of Foreign Statutes

  1. 1 ['Whether the mere tender of foreign legislation enables the Court to make inferences about foreign law' 'Whether it is appropriate to assume foreign law is the same as Australian law for the purpose sought' 'Whether late tender of the statutes has caused prejudice']

Ratio Decidendi

The mere tender of foreign competition statutes, without expert evidence as to their meaning and operation, is insufficient for the Court to infer anything about the content or application of foreign law, and it is not appropriate to assume the foreign law is the same as Australian law. The late tender would also cause prejudice to the respondents, preventing them from properly addressing the material.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • ["The applicant's tender of competition statutes from the United Kingdom, European Union, United States, and New Zealand for the stated purpose is refused."]