Ryde City Council v Calleija [1998] NSWLEC 115

Ryde City Council v Calleija [1998] NSWLEC 115

The defendant was convicted for unlawfully removing 15 mature trees without Council consent, contrary to the Tree Preservation Order and s 125 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The removal was not justified on grounds of safety or health, remediation alone would not suffice, and a monetary penalty was imposed for general deterrence as well as individual culpability.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment and Sentencing
Outcome
defendant convicted, fined, ordered to remediate and pay prosecutor's costs
Legal Topics
['unauthorised Removal of Trees' 'tree Preservation Orders' 'environmental Remediation' 'sentencing for Environmental Offences']
['planning Law' 'environmental Law' 'criminal Law'] ['unauthorised Removal of Trees' 'tree Preservation Orders' 'environmental Remediation' 'sentencing for Environmental Offences']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Judgment and Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the defendant caused the removal of trees contrary to a Tree Preservation Order and s 125 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the defendant had consent or reasonable belief of consent from the Council' 'Whether remediation is sufficient penalty or should be accompanied by a monetary fine' 'Health and significance of the trees removed' 'Application of general deterrence in sentencing for environmental offences']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was convicted for unlawfully removing 15 mature trees without Council consent, contrary to the Tree Preservation Order and s 125 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The removal was not justified on grounds of safety or health, remediation alone would not suffice, and a monetary penalty was imposed for general deterrence as well as individual culpability.

Court Disposition

defendant convicted, fined, ordered to remediate and pay prosecutor's costs

Orders

  • ['Defendant convicted of the offence as charged.' 'Defendant fined $15,000.' 'Defendant to plant trees and retain specified species at 53A Bayview Street, Tennyson, maintaining them to mature growth for five years as per landscape plan PSD97022 SK01/C.' "Defendant to pay prosecutor's costs of $12,000." 'Penalty and...