Stubberfield v Brown [2010] NSWSC 536
Applying the Briginshaw standard, the Court was satisfied that the Defendant had $100,000 cash belonging to the Deceased, based on the 8 June 2005 and 10 April 2006 conversations, the accepted evidence of Mr Daley and Ms Webber, the Defendant's admissions, and her later inconsistent and implausible explanations. Her conduct in relation to that cash made it inappropriate for her to continue as executor, because a remaining task was distribution of the estate in accordance with the judgment and there was a substantial risk she would be reluctant to do so promptly and properly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Proceedings / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiff succeeded; the grant of probate to the Defendant was revoked, administration of the estate was granted to the Plaintiff, declarations were made concerning the Defendant's $100,000 indebtedness, and the Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['revocation of Grant of Probate' 'removal of Executor' 'administration of Estate' "executor's Duty to Account" 'declarations of Indebtedness to Estate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceedings / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Defendant should be removed as an executor of her father's Will." "Whether the Defendant failed to account to the estate for $100,000 in cash alleged to have been in her possession at the time of the Deceased's death." 'Whether declarations should be made that the Defendant was indebted to the Deceased and that $100,000 is owed to the estate.']
Ratio Decidendi
Applying the Briginshaw standard, the Court was satisfied that the Defendant had $100,000 cash belonging to the Deceased, based on the 8 June 2005 and 10 April 2006 conversations, the accepted evidence of Mr Daley and Ms Webber, the Defendant's admissions, and her later inconsistent and implausible explanations. Her conduct in relation to that cash made it inappropriate for her to continue as executor, because a remaining task was distribution of the estate in accordance with the judgment and there was a substantial risk she would be reluctant to do so promptly and properly.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff succeeded; the grant of probate to the Defendant was revoked, administration of the estate was granted to the Plaintiff, declarations were made concerning the Defendant's $100,000 indebtedness, and the Defendant was ordered to pay the Plaintiff's costs.
Orders
- ['That the grant of probate to the Defendant made on 23 March 2007 be revoked.' 'That the Defendant deposit the grant in the Registry.' 'That administration of the estate of the Deceased be granted to the Plaintiff.' 'That as at the date of the death of the Deceased, the Defendant was indebted to the Deceased in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment