Wiseman v American Express Australia Limited [2014] NSWCATAD 15
The Tribunal found that the applicants were unlikely to be able to substantiate their claims that their treatment by Amex was on the grounds of homosexuality or disability, as Amex provided plausible non-discriminatory reasons for their actions and there was insufficient evidence connecting the alleged unfavourable treatment to the protected characteristics.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Proceed With Discrimination Complaint
- Outcome
- Leave to proceed with the complaint of discrimination is refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['homosexuality Discrimination' 'disability Discrimination' 'direct and Indirect Discrimination' 'refusal of Services']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Proceed With Discrimination Complaint
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there is sufficient merit to justify granting leave for the applicants' discrimination complaint under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977" 'Whether the applicants suffered direct or indirect discrimination on the grounds of homosexuality and/or disability']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicants were unlikely to be able to substantiate their claims that their treatment by Amex was on the grounds of homosexuality or disability, as Amex provided plausible non-discriminatory reasons for their actions and there was insufficient evidence connecting the alleged unfavourable treatment to the protected characteristics.
Court Disposition
Leave to proceed with the complaint of discrimination is refused.
Orders
- ["Leave is refused for the Applicants' complaint of discrimination to proceed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment