Calimoso v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1335
Section 494C(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) deems a document transmitted by email to be received at the final moment of the day on which it is transmitted, not at the beginning of the following day. The appellant was therefore deemed to have received notification on 23 October 2015, the time for seeking Tribunal review expired on 13 November 2015, and the Tribunal did not commit reviewable error in determining that it had no jurisdiction because the application lodged on 16 November 2015 was out of time.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal Concerning Construction of S 494 C(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Jurisdiction Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['deemed Receipt of Documents by Email' 'time Limit for Tribunal Review Application' 'meaning of "at the End of the Day"' 'part 5 Reviewable Decision' 'tribunal Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal Concerning Construction of S 494 C(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of an Administrative Appeals Tribunal Jurisdiction Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court judge erred in construing s 494C(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether a document sent by email is deemed to be received at the end of the day on which it is transmitted or at the beginning of the following day.' "Whether the appellant's application to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal was lodged within the prescribed time."]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 494C(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) deems a document transmitted by email to be received at the final moment of the day on which it is transmitted, not at the beginning of the following day. The appellant was therefore deemed to have received notification on 23 October 2015, the time for seeking Tribunal review expired on 13 November 2015, and the Tribunal did not commit reviewable error in determining that it had no jurisdiction because the application lodged on 16 November 2015 was out of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment