SafeWork NSW v BSA Advanced Property Solutions (Fire) Pty Ltd [2022] NSWDC 634
BSA Fire's breach exposed three workers to a risk of death or serious injury and caused Mr Murphy's death. The risk from uncontrolled release of energised water and air in pipes was well known, the potential consequences were death or serious injury, the likelihood was not insignificant, and the steps required to eliminate or minimise the risk were simple, minimally burdensome and low cost. Although BSA Fire had safety systems and significant mitigating factors, its system did not adequately address the pressurised pipe and end cap risk. Its culpability was in the mid range. The appropriate fine was $600,000, reduced by 25% for the early guilty plea to $450,000.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Work Health and Safety Offence Contrary to S 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (nsw) / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted and fined $450,000 after 25% discount for early guilty plea; costs ordered for prosecutor.
- Legal Topics
- ['duty of Persons Conducting a Business or Undertaking' 'risk of Death or Serious Injury' 'failure to Control Pressurised Pipework Hazards' 'objective Seriousness' 'mitigating and Aggravating Factors' 'early Guilty Plea' 'general Deterrence' 'specific Deterrence' 'capacity to Pay Fine' 'prosecution Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Work Health and Safety Offence Contrary to S 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (nsw) / Sentence Following Plea of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for the defendant's failure to comply with its work health and safety duty under s 19 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), exposing workers to a risk of death or serious injury contrary to s 32 of the Act." 'How objectively serious the offence was, including the foreseeability and consequences of the risk and the availability and burden of reasonably practicable measures.' 'What weight should be given to aggravating factors, mitigating factors, deterrence, remorse, cooperation, lack of prior convictions and the early guilty plea.' "Whether the defendant's capacity to pay affected the fine."]
Ratio Decidendi
BSA Fire's breach exposed three workers to a risk of death or serious injury and caused Mr Murphy's death. The risk from uncontrolled release of energised water and air in pipes was well known, the potential consequences were death or serious injury, the likelihood was not insignificant, and the steps required to eliminate or minimise the risk were simple, minimally burdensome and low cost. Although BSA Fire had safety systems and significant mitigating factors, its system did not adequately address the pressurised pipe and end cap risk. Its culpability was in the mid range. The appropriate fine was $600,000, reduced by 25% for the early guilty plea to $450,000.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted and fined $450,000 after 25% discount for early guilty plea; costs ordered for prosecutor.
Orders
- ['BSA Advanced Property Solutions (Fire) Pty Ltd is convicted.' 'The appropriate fine is $600,000 but that will be reduced by 25% to reflect the early plea of guilty.' 'Order BSA Advanced Property Solutions (Fire) Pty Ltd to pay a fine of $450,000.' 'Order pursuant to Section 122(2) of the Fines Act 1996 (NSW) that...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment