SafeWork NSW v BSA Limited (No. 4) [2023] NSWDC 544
Costs should be apportioned to reflect partial success of parties, prosecutor's public duty, and defendant's admissions and disputed issues; prosecutor is entitled to 85% of its costs. Consideration of plea negotiations is inappropriate in costs determination.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Costs Determination After Guilty Plea and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Order for costs apportionment; prosecutor awarded 85% of its costs; exhibits returned.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' "prosecutor's Costs" 'relevant Principles' 'plea Negotiations' 'workplace Death']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Costs Determination After Guilty Plea and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate apportionment of costs in work health and safety prosecution after partial success' 'Relevance of plea negotiations to costs determination' 'Whether costs should be capped or apportioned based on success/failure on issues']
Ratio Decidendi
Costs should be apportioned to reflect partial success of parties, prosecutor's public duty, and defendant's admissions and disputed issues; prosecutor is entitled to 85% of its costs. Consideration of plea negotiations is inappropriate in costs determination.
Court Disposition
Order for costs apportionment; prosecutor awarded 85% of its costs; exhibits returned.
Orders
- ["BSA Limited to pay 85% of prosecutor's costs." 'The exhibits are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment