BSE17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1926
The Tribunal's approach in reasoning about harm to other protestors and the appellant's fears was open on the evidence, logical, and did not constitute jurisdictional error; the Tribunal was not required to consider country information relating to illegal exit as it was not relevant to appellant's circumstances; appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Federal Circuit Court / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'country Information' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Federal Circuit Court / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal acted without evidence or illogically' "Whether the Tribunal failed to consider an integer of appellant's claim" 'Whether the Tribunal failed to take into account relevant information']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's approach in reasoning about harm to other protestors and the appellant's fears was open on the evidence, logical, and did not constitute jurisdictional error; the Tribunal was not required to consider country information relating to illegal exit as it was not relevant to appellant's circumstances; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Extension of time to file notice of appeal granted' "Draft notice of appeal stands as appellant's notice of appeal" 'Appeal treated as instituted and heard instanter' 'Appeal dismissed' "Appellant to pay first respondent's costs, to be fixed by lump sum" 'Parties to file agreed minute of orders for costs within 14...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment