BSX15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 230
Director General of Security should pay applicant's costs from the time it became clear that only access to the Determination was sought, as the claim to public interest immunity was abandoned. Before that time, each party should bear his own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Proceeding / Ruling on Claim to Public Interest Immunity
- Outcome
- Claim to public interest immunity resolved; costs order made as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['public Interest Immunity' 'costs Orders' 'discovery of Documents']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Proceeding / Ruling on Claim to Public Interest Immunity
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the claim to public interest immunity should be upheld in relation to unredacted documents' 'Appropriate costs order following claim to public interest immunity being abandoned']
Ratio Decidendi
Director General of Security should pay applicant's costs from the time it became clear that only access to the Determination was sought, as the claim to public interest immunity was abandoned. Before that time, each party should bear his own costs.
Court Disposition
Claim to public interest immunity resolved; costs order made as specified.
Orders
- ['The notice to produce dated 18 November 2015 is set aside insofar as it required production of specific documents.' "The second respondent is to pay the applicant's costs in relation to the second respondent's public interest immunity claim from 19 December 2015." 'Prior to 19 December 2015, each party is to bear...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment