BT v R [2019] NSWCCA 147

BT v R [2019] NSWCCA 147

The sentencing judge considered and appropriately applied Bugmy principles, exercised discretion regarding special circumstances, and the imposed sentence is not unreasonable or plainly unjust given the offence's seriousness and statutory maximum.

Parties
Applicant: BT; Crown: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Child Sexual Abuse, Mitigating Factors, Special Circumstances, Manifest Excess
Criminal Law Sentencing Sexual Offences Child Sexual Abuse Mitigating Factors Special Circumstances Manifest Excess

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BT

Applicant

Regina

Crown

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether sentencing judge properly applied principles in Bugmy v The Queen
  2. 2 whether sentencing judge failed to find special circumstances
  3. 3 whether the sentence was unreasonable or plainly unjust

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge considered and appropriately applied Bugmy principles, exercised discretion regarding special circumstances, and the imposed sentence is not unreasonable or plainly unjust given the offence's seriousness and statutory maximum.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeal dismissed.