BTB15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 515

BTB15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 515

The Tribunal was not required under s 424A of the Migration Act to disclose country information that was not specifically about the applicant but related to a class of persons. Section 422B is an exhaustive code for procedural fairness in these proceedings. As such, the Tribunal satisfied its statutory obligations, and there was no breach of procedural fairness nor jurisdictional error. The appeal fails.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'country Information' 'jurisdictional Error']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'country Information' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal was obliged under s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 to provide particulars of country information to the appellant' "Whether the Tribunal's use of country information went to procedural fairness and the requirements of natural justice under the Act" 'Whether a failure to provide such information constituted jurisdictional error']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal was not required under s 424A of the Migration Act to disclose country information that was not specifically about the applicant but related to a class of persons. Section 422B is an exhaustive code for procedural fairness in these proceedings. As such, the Tribunal satisfied its statutory obligations, and there was no breach of procedural fairness nor jurisdictional error. The appeal fails.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, to be assessed if not agreed."]