BTI Rural Pty Ltd v Rural & Agricultural Management Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 221

BTI Rural Pty Ltd v Rural & Agricultural Management Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 221

Expedition for a final hearing before 3 June 1997 was not ordered because it would be difficult in the extreme for RAM to prepare, for the Court to hear the matter and deliver judgment by that date, especially if rectification were pursued, and because it was not shown that irreparable harm would occur if final judgment were not obtained before the meeting. Any appeal would also undermine the certainty sought before 3 June.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 May 1997
Procedural Posture
Federal Court Proceeding Concerning Alleged Misleading and Deceptive Conduct in Relation to a Unit Trust Unitholders' Meeting / Return of Application; Application for Expedited Final Hearing Before 3 June 1997 and Directions
Outcome
Application for expedition to enable a final hearing before 3 June 1997 refused; procedural directions made and proceeding stood over for further directions.
Legal Topics
['unit Trust' "unitholders' Meeting" 'expedition of Final Hearing' 'trust Deed Construction' 'farm Management Agreement' 'compensation for Manager' 'rectification']
['trusts' 'civil Procedure' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct'] ['unit Trust' "unitholders' Meeting" 'expedition of Final Hearing' 'trust Deed Construction' 'farm Management Agreement' 'compensation for Manager' 'rectification']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Federal Court Proceeding Concerning Alleged Misleading and Deceptive Conduct in Relation to a Unit Trust Unitholders' Meeting / Return of Application; Application for Expedited Final Hearing Before 3 June 1997 and Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the proceeding should be expedited and a timetable fixed to enable a final hearing and judgment before the unitholders' meeting on 3 June 1997." 'Whether the practical difficulty of preparing and hearing the matter, including a possible rectification claim, weighed against expedition.' 'Whether irreparable harm would occur if the final hearing did not take place before 3 June 1997.' 'Whether alleged delay or acquiescence, hypothetical declarations, or standing affected the request for expedition.']

Ratio Decidendi

Expedition for a final hearing before 3 June 1997 was not ordered because it would be difficult in the extreme for RAM to prepare, for the Court to hear the matter and deliver judgment by that date, especially if rectification were pursued, and because it was not shown that irreparable harm would occur if final judgment were not obtained before the meeting. Any appeal would also undermine the certainty sought before 3 June.

Court Disposition

Application for expedition to enable a final hearing before 3 June 1997 refused; procedural directions made and proceeding stood over for further directions.

Orders

  • ['DIRECT the first respondent to make requests for particulars and to notify the applicant of any objections to the statement of claim by 23 May 1997.' 'GRANT leave to the applicant to add ANZ Nominees Ltd as second applicant, and to file and serve any amended application and any amended statement of claim by 27 May...