BTP18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 265

BTP18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 265

The Authority did not engage in a proscribed relative risk assessment but applied the real chance test to assess the objective risk faced by the appellant in his home region; therefore, no jurisdictional error occurred and the appeal must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'real Chance Test' 'protection Visa' 'objective Versus Relative Assessment' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution']
['migration Law'] ['judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'real Chance Test' 'protection Visa' 'objective Versus Relative Assessment' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority misapplied the 'real chance' test" 'Whether the Authority conducted a relative, rather than objective, assessment of risk' 'Whether there was jurisdictional error in the merits review']

Ratio Decidendi

The Authority did not engage in a proscribed relative risk assessment but applied the real chance test to assess the objective risk faced by the appellant in his home region; therefore, no jurisdictional error occurred and the appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs as assessed or agreed."]