BTR ENGINEERING (AUSTRALIA) LTD [formerly BORG WARNER (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED] v MISESKI [1991] NSWCA 35
The trial judge gave sufficient reasons for the decision by stating he believed the worker’s evidence, corroborated by medical testimony, and that he was not required to detail reasons for rejecting every contrary argument or experiment offered by the defendant; accordingly, no error of law was established.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: BTR Engineering (Australia) Ltd [formerly Borg Warner (Australia) Limited]; Respondent: Miseski
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Compensation Court Decision / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Requirement for Judicial Reasons, Sufficiency of Reasons in Judgments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BTR Engineering (Australia) Ltd [formerly Borg Warner (Australia) Limited]
Appellant
Miseski
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Compensation Court Decision / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Compensation Court judge gave sufficient reasons for accepting the worker's version of events and making an order in his favour
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge gave sufficient reasons for the decision by stating he believed the worker’s evidence, corroborated by medical testimony, and that he was not required to detail reasons for rejecting every contrary argument or experiment offered by the defendant; accordingly, no error of law was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay respondent's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment