BTU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 538

BTU17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 538

The application was dismissed because the Federal Circuit Court correctly understood the task under s 477(2), considered relevant matters including the moderate delay, the explanation for delay and whether the proposed judicial review grounds disclosed a serious question to be tried, afforded procedural fairness, did not misconstrue the statute, did not consider impermissible matters or fail to consider mandatory matters, and therefore made no jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Judicial Review of a Federal Circuit Court Decision Refusing to Extend Time Under S 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Federal Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time' 'federal Circuit Court Migration Jurisdiction' 'interests of the Administration of Justice' 'temporary Protection Visa']
['migration' 'administrative Law' 'judicial Review'] ['jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time' 'federal Circuit Court Migration Jurisdiction' 'interests of the Administration of Justice' 'temporary Protection Visa']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 39 B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (cth) for Judicial Review of a Federal Circuit Court Decision Refusing to Extend Time Under S 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth) / Federal Court Judgment on Application for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court made jurisdictional error in refusing to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court misunderstood its function, failed to consider a mandatory relevant matter, considered an impermissible matter, or denied procedural fairness.' "Whether the Federal Circuit Court's assessment that the proposed grounds of review did not disclose a serious question to be tried involved jurisdictional error."]

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the Federal Circuit Court correctly understood the task under s 477(2), considered relevant matters including the moderate delay, the explanation for delay and whether the proposed judicial review grounds disclosed a serious question to be tried, afforded procedural fairness, did not misconstrue the statute, did not consider impermissible matters or fail to consider mandatory matters, and therefore made no jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs."]