SafeWork NSW v Buddco Pty Limited (No. 2) [2023] NSWDC 128

SafeWork NSW v Buddco Pty Limited (No. 2) [2023] NSWDC 128

Buddco Pty Limited had a high degree of culpability for failing to implement straightforward, reasonably practicable safety measures to ensure electrical isolation of an ink holding tank, resulting in foreseeable and catastrophic consequences. Despite the company's limited capacity to pay, the seriousness of the offence, need for deterrence, and other sentencing factors warranted a substantial fine, moderated to $600,000, conviction recorded, and payment of prosecution costs.

Parties
Prosecutor: SafeWork NSW; Defendant: Buddco Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution Work Health and Safety / Sentence
Outcome
Defendant convicted, fined, and ordered to pay costs
Legal Topics
Workplace Safety Duties, Sentencing, Employer Liability, Fines, Prosecution Costs, Mitigating and Aggravating Factors, Objective Seriousness, Victim Impact Statements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SafeWork NSW

Prosecutor

Buddco Pty Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution Work Health and Safety / Sentence

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for a breach of s 19 and s 32 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)?
  2. 2 What is the objective seriousness of Buddco's breach?
  3. 3 What mitigating and aggravating factors are relevant to sentencing?

Ratio Decidendi

Buddco Pty Limited had a high degree of culpability for failing to implement straightforward, reasonably practicable safety measures to ensure electrical isolation of an ink holding tank, resulting in foreseeable and catastrophic consequences. Despite the company's limited capacity to pay, the seriousness of the offence, need for deterrence, and other sentencing factors warranted a substantial fine, moderated to $600,000, conviction recorded, and payment of prosecution costs.

Court Disposition

Defendant convicted, fined, and ordered to pay costs

Orders

  • Buddco Pty Limited was convicted on 26 April 2023.
  • Buddco Pty Limited to pay a fine of $600,000.