Building Professionals Board v Hans (GD) [2008] NSWADTAP 13
The Panel exercised its discretion to grant leave for the appeal to extend to the merits and to admit further evidence because the evidence was likely to have produced a different result regarding penalties and findings had it been tendered at first instance, and such admission was consonant with public interest and procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Internal Appeal / Application for Leave to Extend Appeal to Merits/adduce Further Evidence
- Outcome
- Leave granted for appeal to extend to merits and for admission of further evidence; appeal set down for directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Extend Appeal to Merits' 'admission of Further Evidence' 'disciplinary Proceedings' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'professional Misconduct']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal / Application for Leave to Extend Appeal to Merits/adduce Further Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should leave be granted for the appeal to extend to the merits?' 'Should leave be granted to admit further evidence in the appeal?']
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel exercised its discretion to grant leave for the appeal to extend to the merits and to admit further evidence because the evidence was likely to have produced a different result regarding penalties and findings had it been tendered at first instance, and such admission was consonant with public interest and procedural fairness in disciplinary proceedings.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for appeal to extend to merits and for admission of further evidence; appeal set down for directions.
Orders
- ['Leave granted for appeal to extend to a review of the merits.' 'Leave granted for admission of further evidence by the appellant at hearing.' 'Appeal set down for further directions at a date/time to be fixed by the Registry in consultation with parties.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment