Robust Builders Pty Ltd v Barai & Anor (No.6) [2023] NSWDC 376

Robust Builders Pty Ltd v Barai & Anor (No.6) [2023] NSWDC 376

The Court found that the contract was entered into on 24 September 2016 for $350,000 and adjusted to $510,000 (inclusive of variations agreed by 20 November 2016) via a collateral agreement. The builder was entitled to claim further variations, but only some of the claimed invoices were proven and payable ($45,800). The evidence proved there was defective and incomplete work, and the cross-claimants (owners) were entitled to rectification costs ($196,975, less the builder's award). The occupancy certificate and compliance documents did not preclude findings of defects, and the rectification order had limited evidential value. The builder's claim in restitution and for equipment in detinue...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Cross-claim substantially successful (judgment for cross-claimants); builder's claim partially allowed and set-off. Costs to cross-claimants. Judgment amounts calculated.
Legal Topics
['building Contracts' 'unpaid Invoices' 'contract Formation Date' 'collateral Agreement' 'variation Claims' 'defective and Incomplete Works' 'occupancy Certificate' 'proof of Defect' 'rectification Order' 'statutory Warranties' 'set Off']
['contracts' 'building and Construction Law'] ['building Contracts' 'unpaid Invoices' 'contract Formation Date' 'collateral Agreement' 'variation Claims' 'defective and Incomplete Works' 'occupancy Certificate' 'proof of Defect' 'rectification Order' 'statutory Warranties' 'set Off']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['When was the contract entered into?' 'Was there a cap on the value of variations?' 'Are the owners liable for unpaid invoices?' 'Were the claimed variations proven?' 'Were works defective/incomplete?' 'What is the significance of the occupancy certificate and compliance reports to proof of defective or incomplete works?' 'What is the significance of the rectification order?']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the contract was entered into on 24 September 2016 for $350,000 and adjusted to $510,000 (inclusive of variations agreed by 20 November 2016) via a collateral agreement. The builder was entitled to claim further variations, but only some of the claimed invoices were proven and payable ($45,800). The evidence proved there was defective and incomplete work, and the cross-claimants (owners) were entitled to rectification costs ($196,975, less the builder's award). The occupancy certificate and compliance documents did not preclude findings of defects, and the rectification order had limited evidential value. The builder's claim in restitution and for equipment in detinue...

Court Disposition

Cross-claim substantially successful (judgment for cross-claimants); builder's claim partially allowed and set-off. Costs to cross-claimants. Judgment amounts calculated.

Orders

  • ['Judgment for the plaintiff on the Statement of Claim (as amended) for $45,800.' 'Judgment for the cross-claimants on the cross-claim for $196,975.' 'By operation of s 96 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), the Judgment for the plaintiff is satisfied and judgment for the cross-claimants is reduced by $45,800;...