Builtex Constructions Pty Ltd v He [2019] NSWCATAP 95

Builtex Constructions Pty Ltd v He [2019] NSWCATAP 95

The owner validly terminated the contract by issuing compliant notices of dispute and default according to contractual requirements, and was not in fundamental breach regarding the bank guarantee; the builder's quantum meruit claim fails as there was no valid repudiation. The costs discretion was properly exercised and costs should not be apportioned, with indemnity costs justified by builder’s unreasonable refusal of a genuine Calderbank settlement offer. Leave to appeal is refused, and appeal dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Builtex Constructions Pty Ltd; Respondent: Katrina Wai San He
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment (orders and Reasons)
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed; costs awarded against appellant.
Legal Topics
Termination of Contract, Statutory Warranties, Notice Requirements, Retention and Bank Guarantee, Quantum Meruit, Costs and Costs Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Builtex Constructions Pty Ltd

Appellant

Katrina Wai San He

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment (orders and Reasons)

  1. 1 Whether the owner validly terminated the contract
  2. 2 Whether valid notice of dispute and notice of default were given in accordance with contractual requirements
  3. 3 Whether the contract was repudiated

Ratio Decidendi

The owner validly terminated the contract by issuing compliant notices of dispute and default according to contractual requirements, and was not in fundamental breach regarding the bank guarantee; the builder's quantum meruit claim fails as there was no valid repudiation. The costs discretion was properly exercised and costs should not be apportioned, with indemnity costs justified by builder’s unreasonable refusal of a genuine Calderbank settlement offer. Leave to appeal is refused, and appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed; costs awarded against appellant.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused.
  • The appeal is dismissed.