Environment Protection Authority v Bulga Coal Management Pty Ltd [2013] NSWLEC 29
The preliminary disclosure regime under Div 2A of Ch 4, Pt 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 does not override the discrete and initial obligation under s 247E for the prosecutor to provide a complete and unqualified notice of the prosecution case before preliminary disclosure orders can be made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Interlocutory Motion; Preliminary Disclosure Orders
- Outcome
- Prosecutor's Notice of Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['disclosure' 'notice of Prosecution Case' 'preliminary Disclosure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Interlocutory Motion; Preliminary Disclosure Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 247E notice of prosecution case is complete' 'Whether preliminary disclosure orders under s 247I, s 247J, s 247K, s 247L should be made']
Ratio Decidendi
The preliminary disclosure regime under Div 2A of Ch 4, Pt 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 does not override the discrete and initial obligation under s 247E for the prosecutor to provide a complete and unqualified notice of the prosecution case before preliminary disclosure orders can be made.
Court Disposition
Prosecutor's Notice of Motion dismissed
Orders
- ["The Prosecutor's Notice of Motion dated 1 March 2013 is dismissed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment