Bullabidgee Pty Ltd v McCleary; McCleary v Bullabidgee Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 145

Bullabidgee Pty Ltd v McCleary; McCleary v Bullabidgee Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 145

Although vendors engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by misrepresenting croppable acreage, purchasers did not rely on such conduct and suffered no loss or damage thereby. Statutory avoidance under Fair Trading Act s 72 was unavailable and would be declined in any event. Vendors validly terminated contracts for purchasers' default and are entitled to damages for breach of contract and trespass. Return of deposit under s 55(2A) is declined.

Parties
Plaintiff: Bullabidgee Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Towool Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Towool West Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Towool Water Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Warrawool Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Warrawool North Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Warrawool Water Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: MHD Echuca Pty Ltd; Plaintiff: Ian Tayles; Defendant: Brian John McCleary; Defendant: Peter Joseph Rae; Defendant: JP & M Kerr (Billabidgee) Pty Ltd; Defendant: Bullatale Pastoral Pty Ltd; Defendant: Bullabidgee Pty Ltd; Defendant: Towool Pty Ltd; Defendant: Towool West Pty Ltd; Defendant: Towool Water Pty Ltd; Defendant: Warrawool Pty Ltd; Defendant: Warrawool North Pty Ltd; Defendant: Warrawool Water Pty Ltd; Defendant: MHD Echuca Pty Ltd; Defendant: Ian Tayles; Defendant: Ricegrowers Limited t/as Sunrice
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Equity / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Vendors engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, but purchasers did not rely and suffered no loss; vendors validly terminated for purchaser default; damages awarded to vendors; return of deposit declined.
Legal Topics
Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Contract for Sale of Land, Damages, Trespass, Statutory Avoidance, Forfeiture of Deposit

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bullabidgee Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Towool Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Towool West Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Towool Water Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Warrawool Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Warrawool North Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Warrawool Water Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

MHD Echuca Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Ian Tayles

Plaintiff

Brian John McCleary

Defendant

Peter Joseph Rae

Defendant

JP & M Kerr (Billabidgee) Pty Ltd

Defendant

Bullatale Pastoral Pty Ltd

Defendant

Bullabidgee Pty Ltd

Defendant

Towool Pty Ltd

Defendant

Towool West Pty Ltd

Defendant

Towool Water Pty Ltd

Defendant

Warrawool Pty Ltd

Defendant

Warrawool North Pty Ltd

Defendant

Warrawool Water Pty Ltd

Defendant

MHD Echuca Pty Ltd

Defendant

Ian Tayles

Defendant

Ricegrowers Limited t/as Sunrice

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity / Final Judgment After Hearing

  1. 1 Whether vendors engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct
  2. 2 Whether purchasers relied on such conduct and suffered loss
  3. 3 Whether contracts should be avoided under Fair Trading Act s 72

Ratio Decidendi

Although vendors engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by misrepresenting croppable acreage, purchasers did not rely on such conduct and suffered no loss or damage thereby. Statutory avoidance under Fair Trading Act s 72 was unavailable and would be declined in any event. Vendors validly terminated contracts for purchasers' default and are entitled to damages for breach of contract and trespass. Return of deposit under s 55(2A) is declined.

Court Disposition

Vendors engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, but purchasers did not rely and suffered no loss; vendors validly terminated for purchaser default; damages awarded to vendors; return of deposit declined.

Orders

  • Judgment for possession to vendors; leave to issue writ of possession
  • Purchasers to withdraw caveats by specified date