Bullant v Mr Carpet [2000] NSWSC 165

Bullant v Mr Carpet [2000] NSWSC 165

There was a genuine dispute about the truth of the representation that the premises had a lettable area of 550.10 square metres and about reliance on that representation. Because a successful s 87 Trade Practices Act application could set the lease aside ab initio, there would then be no repudiation of the lease and no damages for breach; accordingly there was a genuine dispute about the very existence of the debt claimed in the statutory demand.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 2000
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 459 G of the Corporations Law to Set Aside a Statutory Demand / Judgment
Outcome
Statutory demand set aside; defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs.
Legal Topics
['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'lease Repudiation' 'liquidated Damages' 'offsetting Claim']
['corporations Law' 'trade Practices' 'contract' 'leasing'] ['statutory Demand' 'genuine Dispute' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'lease Repudiation' 'liquidated Damages' 'offsetting Claim']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under S 459 G of the Corporations Law to Set Aside a Statutory Demand / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a genuine dispute under the Corporations Law concerning the debt claimed in the statutory demand.' 'Whether alleged misrepresentations about the lettable area, suitability for office use, staffing capacity and access gave rise to a genuine dispute.' 'Whether a potential claim under s 87 of the Trade Practices Act to set aside the lease ab initio could dispute the existence of the debt claimed for repudiation of the lease.' 'Whether the plaintiff had an offsetting claim in respect of amounts paid or rent liability.']

Ratio Decidendi

There was a genuine dispute about the truth of the representation that the premises had a lettable area of 550.10 square metres and about reliance on that representation. Because a successful s 87 Trade Practices Act application could set the lease aside ab initio, there would then be no repudiation of the lease and no damages for breach; accordingly there was a genuine dispute about the very existence of the debt claimed in the statutory demand.

Court Disposition

Statutory demand set aside; defendant ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs.

Orders

  • ['That the statutory demand served by the defendant on the plaintiff on 9 December 1999 be set aside.' "That the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs."]