Bunnings Group Limited v Fairfield City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1602
The Court endorsed the parties' agreement to uphold the appeal and grant development consent, being satisfied the decision was within its power, the proposed use was permissible, relevant notifications and considerations had occurred, and no jurisdictional impediments existed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Post Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'land Use' 'permissibility of Development' 'jurisdictional Powers']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Post Conciliation Conference, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development is permissible under applicable planning instruments' 'Whether the agreement between parties is one the Court can endorse under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court endorsed the parties' agreement to uphold the appeal and grant development consent, being satisfied the decision was within its power, the proposed use was permissible, relevant notifications and considerations had occurred, and no jurisdictional impediments existed.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. 413.1/2017 to rely on specified amended plans and documents.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application No. 413.1/2017 for change of use and associated works at 21 Bonnyrigg Avenue, Bonnyrigg, subject to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment