Burrows v R [2017] NSWCCA 45

Burrows v R [2017] NSWCCA 45

No error was established in the sentencing judge's assessment of the applicant's culpability, weighting of youth, or observance of the parity principle. The applicant's sentence was appropriately differentiated according to his lesser role, youth, and subjective case, and was not manifestly excessive compared to co-offenders. Leave to appeal is refused.

Parties
Applicant: Burrows; Respondent: Regina (Crown)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Break and Enter, Aggravated Offences, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Parity Principle
Criminal Law Sentencing Break and Enter Aggravated Offences Joint Criminal Enterprise Parity Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Burrows

Applicant

Regina (Crown)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sentencing judge erred in assessment of culpability regarding joint criminal enterprise
  2. 2 Whether sentencing judge gave adequate weight to applicant's youth
  3. 3 Whether parity principle was observed in comparison to co-offenders' sentences

Ratio Decidendi

No error was established in the sentencing judge's assessment of the applicant's culpability, weighting of youth, or observance of the parity principle. The applicant's sentence was appropriately differentiated according to his lesser role, youth, and subjective case, and was not manifestly excessive compared to co-offenders. Leave to appeal is refused.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused.