Burwood Council v Ralan Burwood Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 106
Because the Council did not object to the late filing, and because the competency issue should be dealt with by the Court of Appeal in connection with the appeal rather than by the case management judge in advance, directions were made for Ralan to file and serve its motion, affidavit and submissions and for the Council to file and serve its response and any evidence before the listed hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Case Management Directions in an Appeal Before the Hearing
- Outcome
- Directions made; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['case Management' 'late Filing of Notice of Objection to Competency' 'want of Parties' 'time Limits on Oral Address']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Case Management Directions in an Appeal Before the Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Ralan should be permitted, late, to file a notice of motion objecting to the competency of the appeal for want of parties.' 'Whether the objection to competency should be determined in advance of the appeal.' 'How the appeal and the proposed motion should be managed within the listed two day hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Council did not object to the late filing, and because the competency issue should be dealt with by the Court of Appeal in connection with the appeal rather than by the case management judge in advance, directions were made for Ralan to file and serve its motion, affidavit and submissions and for the Council to file and serve its response and any evidence before the listed hearing.
Court Disposition
Directions made; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Direct that Ralan file and serve by 9am Thursday 3 April 2014 a notice of motion, affidavit and submissions.' 'Direct that the Council file and serve its submissions in response, and any evidence on which it seeks to rely in response, by 4pm Monday 7 April 2014.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment