Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Incorporated v Environment Protection Authority [2021] NSWLEC 92
The EPA has a duty under s 9(1)(a) of the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 (NSW) to develop environmental quality objectives, guidelines and policies to ensure environment protection from climate change, and this duty remains unperformed. None of the EPA's existing instruments sufficiently address environment protection from climate change. Accordingly, mandamus should issue compelling the EPA to perform its duty, but the Court will not order the EPA to take a specific regulatory approach beyond the statutory requirement.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Incorporated; Respondent: Environment Protection Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Mandamus granted.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Duty—failure to Perform, Mandamus, Climate Change Policy, Judicial Review of Statutory Powers, Discretion in Performing Statutory Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bushfire Survivors for Climate Action Incorporated
Applicant
Environment Protection Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the nature and content of the duty imposed on the EPA by s 9(1)(a) of the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 (NSW)?
- 2 Has the EPA breached its duty under s 9(1)(a)?
- 3 What order should be made to remedy the breach of duty?
Ratio Decidendi
The EPA has a duty under s 9(1)(a) of the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 (NSW) to develop environmental quality objectives, guidelines and policies to ensure environment protection from climate change, and this duty remains unperformed. None of the EPA's existing instruments sufficiently address environment protection from climate change. Accordingly, mandamus should issue compelling the EPA to perform its duty, but the Court will not order the EPA to take a specific regulatory approach beyond the statutory requirement.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Mandamus granted.
Orders
- The Environment Protection Authority, in accordance with s 9(1)(a) of the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 (NSW), is to develop environmental quality objectives, guidelines and policies to ensure environment protection from climate change.
- The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment