Police v Butler [2003] NSWLC 2
Although the defendant's conduct was ill-advised, rude and improper, community standards had changed and the magistrate was not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the repeated use of "fuck" and its derivatives in the factual circumstances was offensive within the meaning of the Act to a reasonably tolerant, understanding and contemporary person.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution for Offensive Language / Local Court Decision on Summons; Prosecution Relied on Tendered Brief and Defence Called No Evidence
- Outcome
- Charge dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['summary Offences' 'offensive Language' 'public Order' 'community Standards' 'reasonable Person Test']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution for Offensive Language / Local Court Decision on Summons; Prosecution Relied on Tendered Brief and Defence Called No Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant\'s repeated use of the word "fuck" and its derivatives, shouted in the circumstances of a neighbourhood dispute and capable of being heard from a public place, was offensive language within the meaning of the Act.' 'Whether the prosecution proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the language would wound, anger or outrage a reasonably tolerant, understanding and contemporary person.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the defendant's conduct was ill-advised, rude and improper, community standards had changed and the magistrate was not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the repeated use of "fuck" and its derivatives in the factual circumstances was offensive within the meaning of the Act to a reasonably tolerant, understanding and contemporary person.
Court Disposition
Charge dismissed
Orders
- ['Charge of offensive language dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment