Butterfield Services Pty Ltd v Bentley [2013] NSWSC 1217
Leave to amend was granted as the plaintiff sufficiently justified the delay and specificity of allegations, none of the grounds for resistance individually or collectively warranted refusal, and the interlocutory stage precluded definitive assessment of fraudulent concealment or prejudice to the defendant.
- Parties
- Applicant: Butterfield Services Pty Ltd; Respondent: Jonathon Bentley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Motion for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Leave to amend granted; security for costs ordered; costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Leave to Amend Outside Prescribed Period, Limitation of Actions, Fraudulent Concealment, Breach of Contract, Security for Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Butterfield Services Pty Ltd
Applicant
Jonathon Bentley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Motion for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend statement of claim outside prescribed period
- 2 Whether allegation of fraudulent concealment is sufficiently pleaded and not doomed to failure
- 3 Whether alleged prejudice to defendant warrants refusal of leave
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend was granted as the plaintiff sufficiently justified the delay and specificity of allegations, none of the grounds for resistance individually or collectively warranted refusal, and the interlocutory stage precluded definitive assessment of fraudulent concealment or prejudice to the defendant.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend granted; security for costs ordered; costs orders made
Orders
- Plaintiff has leave to file amended statement of claim by specified date in form provided to defendant's solicitors.
- Plaintiff to provide additional security for defendant's costs of proceedings in sum of $30,000 by specified date by variation of mortgage, increasing total sum secured to $126,605.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment