BUZ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 23

BUZ15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 23

No appellable error was identified in the FCCA judge’s application of the law regarding reasonableness and risk in relocation; the Tribunal properly found the risk in Lahore to be remote and the relocation practicable for the appellant.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 January 2017
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['migration' 'protection Visas' 'judicial Review' 'reasonableness of Relocation']
['administrative Law' 'constitutional Law' 'human Rights Law'] ['migration' 'protection Visas' 'judicial Review' 'reasonableness of Relocation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in finding that the appellant did not face any appreciable risk of harm by relocating to Lahore' 'Whether it was reasonable and practicable for the appellant to relocate to Lahore under all the circumstances']

Ratio Decidendi

No appellable error was identified in the FCCA judge’s application of the law regarding reasonableness and risk in relocation; the Tribunal properly found the risk in Lahore to be remote and the relocation practicable for the appellant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]