BVH18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 228

BVH18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCA 228

The appeal was dismissed because the Authority's adverse credibility findings were open to it, its conclusion that the appellant did not face a real chance of serious harm or a real risk of significant harm in Nepal disclosed no jurisdictional error, s 424 did not apply to the Pt 7AA review, and no denial of natural justice, bias, or failure to consider identified relevant information was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of Immigration Assessment Authority Decision Affirming Refusal of Safe Haven Enterprise Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 'refugee Protection Criterion' 'complementary Protection' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'adverse Credibility Findings']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 'refugee Protection Criterion' 'complementary Protection' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'adverse Credibility Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From Decision Dismissing Judicial Review of Immigration Assessment Authority Decision Affirming Refusal of Safe Haven Enterprise Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in dismissing the judicial review application on grounds of unreasonableness and material facts before the Immigration Assessment Authority.' 'Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority properly applied s 36(2) and s 36(2A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether s 424 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applied to the Immigration Assessment Authority review.' 'Whether the appellant was denied natural justice or whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider relevant information about harm in Nepal.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Authority's adverse credibility findings were open to it, its conclusion that the appellant did not face a real chance of serious harm or a real risk of significant harm in Nepal disclosed no jurisdictional error, s 424 did not apply to the Pt 7AA review, and no denial of natural justice, bias, or failure to consider identified relevant information was established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed."]