Byron Shire Council v Cole [2003] NSWLEC 47

Byron Shire Council v Cole [2003] NSWLEC 47

No order as to costs is made because the proceedings ended without adjudication on the merits, the respondent did not satisfy the applicant’s claim, and supervening acts led to the respondent vacating the premises. Parties acted reasonably, so each should bear their own costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Application / Final Orders After Proceedings Terminated Without Adjudication on the Merits
Outcome
Application dismissed by consent
Legal Topics
['costs in Class 4 Proceedings' 'interlocutory Injunction' 'declaratory and Injunctive Relief' 'termination of Proceedings Without Adjudication']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 4 Application / Final Orders After Proceedings Terminated Without Adjudication on the Merits

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should be awarded when proceedings are terminated without adjudication on the merits' "Whether the respondent 'satisfied' the applicant's claim under Land and Environment Court Rules Pt 15 r 7"]

Ratio Decidendi

No order as to costs is made because the proceedings ended without adjudication on the merits, the respondent did not satisfy the applicant’s claim, and supervening acts led to the respondent vacating the premises. Parties acted reasonably, so each should bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed by consent

Orders

  • ['By consent the application is dismissed.' 'The interlocutory injunction made on 24 January 2003 to continue until 10 February 2003, when it will be discharged.' 'Each party bear its own costs in the proceedings.']